[blml] What is equity - added substance. [Long]

[Alain Gottcheiner]

Herman De Wael a écrit :
>
>
> No John, could have known means "could have known". This man could not 
> have known.
>
> You need to make the distinction between 2 pieces of knowledge:
> -could have known that he revoked
> -could have known that to revoke next would be in best interest
>
> Of course the first "could have known" is true. But the second one is not.
>
> Either this player: knows that he has revoked, and hasn't said 
> anything - then he is a cheat;
>   

No Sir. If he realizes that he has revoked on a previous trick, L72 B3 
explicitly allows him to keep mum about it.
In that case, he might realize at the same time that it might be 
favorable to him to revoke a second time and home declarer claims at 
some time of the deal.
In that case, old L72B4 says he may not ; and L72B1 implies it, too.

Ergo, it is perfectly possible for somebody to rewoke in all good faith 
and revoke a second time in no faith at all.


Best regards


   Alain