[blml] The sixth sick sheik's sixth sheep is sick [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

Herman De Wael hermandw at skynet.be
Thu Oct 4 15:55:01 CEST 2007


Brian wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:49:04 +0200
> Herman De Wael <hermandw at skynet.be> wrote:
> 
>> I know how this works, Brian, and rather than tell me off for using 
>> the word expelled, you could be joining me or not in condemming the 
>> piece itself.
>>
> 
> OK. I'm much closer to Richard's point of view than yours. Is that what
> you wanted? 
> 

No it's not. I don't mind Richard, you, or anyone disagreeing with me. 
What I do object to is Richard calling my actions illegal and unlawful 
thrice in one sentence, and for him doing so without any comment on 
what I actually said. It is the so so manyth ad hominem attack of his, 
and I am fed up with it. If he cannot find any arguments, then please 
ask him to stop commenting.

How can an advice be illegal - I can advice whatever I want, can't I? 
People can follow my advice or not, can they not? And their actions 
will be judged illegal or not - but my advice cannot be illegal. As to 
my ruling, that is per definition legal, since it will be given by a 
qualified director. The ruling may be changed by an AC, but that does 
not make the ruling illegal.
Yet Richard can call me illegal and unlawful without anyone objecting?



-- 
Herman DE WAEL
Antwerpen Belgium
http://users.skynet.be/hermandw/index.html



More information about the blml mailing list