[blml] The sixth sick sheik's sixth sheep is sick [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
Herman De Wael
hermandw at skynet.be
Thu Oct 4 15:55:01 CEST 2007
Brian wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:49:04 +0200
> Herman De Wael <hermandw at skynet.be> wrote:
>
>> I know how this works, Brian, and rather than tell me off for using
>> the word expelled, you could be joining me or not in condemming the
>> piece itself.
>>
>
> OK. I'm much closer to Richard's point of view than yours. Is that what
> you wanted?
>
No it's not. I don't mind Richard, you, or anyone disagreeing with me.
What I do object to is Richard calling my actions illegal and unlawful
thrice in one sentence, and for him doing so without any comment on
what I actually said. It is the so so manyth ad hominem attack of his,
and I am fed up with it. If he cannot find any arguments, then please
ask him to stop commenting.
How can an advice be illegal - I can advice whatever I want, can't I?
People can follow my advice or not, can they not? And their actions
will be judged illegal or not - but my advice cannot be illegal. As to
my ruling, that is per definition legal, since it will be given by a
qualified director. The ruling may be changed by an AC, but that does
not make the ruling illegal.
Yet Richard can call me illegal and unlawful without anyone objecting?
--
Herman DE WAEL
Antwerpen Belgium
http://users.skynet.be/hermandw/index.html
More information about the blml
mailing list