[blml] Law 75D2

Gampas at aol.com Gampas at aol.com
Thu Oct 4 16:45:50 CEST 2007


> The bidding has gone:
>
>  WEST      NORTH      EAST      SOUTH
>  ---       ---        Pass      1H
>  2D        3H(1)      Pass      Pass
> Pass(2)
>  ?
>
> (1) Not alerted, so implicitly described as a
> limit  raise, since the sponsoring organisation
> alert regulation required other  meanings for 3H
> to be alerted.
>
> (2) As required by Law  75D2, North called the
> Director before the opening lead to advise  that
> 3H should have been alerted, since the North-
> South  partnership understanding was that 3H
> showed a pre-emptive raise.   As required by Law
> 21B1, the Director permitted West to retract
>  their Pass and substitute another call.
>
> You, West,  hold:
>
> Q852
> T4
> AKQ864
> A
>
>  What call do you substitute?

I would double, and I would presume that to bid 3S, exploiting the fact  that 
partner would now know that I would have passed over a limit 3H, and  
therefore must have a marginal 3S bid, is not active ethics. I would have  doubled 
even if 3H was limit. You can then pull 4C to 4D and will have suggested  this 
hand.
 
Paul



   



More information about the blml mailing list