[blml] Law 75D2
Gampas at aol.com
Gampas at aol.com
Thu Oct 4 16:45:50 CEST 2007
> The bidding has gone:
>
> WEST NORTH EAST SOUTH
> --- --- Pass 1H
> 2D 3H(1) Pass Pass
> Pass(2)
> ?
>
> (1) Not alerted, so implicitly described as a
> limit raise, since the sponsoring organisation
> alert regulation required other meanings for 3H
> to be alerted.
>
> (2) As required by Law 75D2, North called the
> Director before the opening lead to advise that
> 3H should have been alerted, since the North-
> South partnership understanding was that 3H
> showed a pre-emptive raise. As required by Law
> 21B1, the Director permitted West to retract
> their Pass and substitute another call.
>
> You, West, hold:
>
> Q852
> T4
> AKQ864
> A
>
> What call do you substitute?
I would double, and I would presume that to bid 3S, exploiting the fact that
partner would now know that I would have passed over a limit 3H, and
therefore must have a marginal 3S bid, is not active ethics. I would have doubled
even if 3H was limit. You can then pull 4C to 4D and will have suggested this
hand.
Paul
More information about the blml
mailing list