[blml] Who says dummy has no rights?

[Adam Beneschan]

David Kent wrote:
 
> Is there supposed to be two HJ and no H5?

Interesting that you'd object to that, but not to the fact that North
has 14 cards and South has 12.  (That wasn't the issue with the real
hand, was it?)

                                -- Adam

 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: blml-bounces at amsterdamned.org
> [mailto:blml-bounces at amsterdamned.org] On Behalf Of Gampas at aol.com
> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 10:51 AM
> To: blml at amsterdamned.org
> Subject: Re: [blml] Who says dummy has no rights?
> 
> The tabbing did not work last time, so I am  trying for a third time!:
> 
> Richard's Rueful Rabbit story reminds me of the  following   hand:
> 
> .................Q65432
> .................104
> .................973
> .................J42
> J97                             K8
> K872                           AJ963
> 654                             KJ82
> 865                             73
> .................A10
> .................QJ
> .................AQ10
> .................AKQ109
> 
> Dealer  West; N/S Game; Teams
> West North East  South
> Pass  Pass  2H!   3H!
> Pass  3NT   Pass   Pass
> Pass(H)
> 
> 2H was a 5-9 weak two. 3H said "please bid 3NT with  a  heart stop" and
> 3NT  
> said "I missed pard, but I am unaware of  the  mechanical error rule and
> 
> think 
> the 
> bid has to stand". The  final pass was  slow. East led the six of
> hearts, and 
>  
> switched to  a diamond after five  rounds of hearts had been cashed. The
> 
> question is "How do you now make  3NT as dummy?"
> 
> Paul  Lamford