[blml] Réf. : Re: The sixth sick sheik's sixth sheep is sick[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Sven Pran]

> On Behalf Of Herman De Wael
...............
> Sven Pran wrote:
> > Alain Gottcheiner wrote among other things:
> >
> > Whenever both possible reactions (here, knowingly creating MI or
> > knowingly creating UI) are badly wrong according to the book,
> >
> > My comment is plainly:
> >
> > I fail to see any conflict. Maybe you can enlighten me on where in the
> laws
> > it is stated that "knowingly creating UI" is an offence?
> >
> 
> You FAIL TO SEE ANY CONFLICT?
> 
> Blind, that's what you are.
> 
> > According to my understanding of the laws it is the use of UI and not
> the
> > creation of UI that is violation of laws. Consequently (unless you can
> point
> > me to a law that says otherwise) the solution is crystal clear:
> >
> 
> Dealt with 27 times already.
> But I'm the one that always keeps up saying the same things, am I?
> 
> > "Thou shalt avoid giving MI to opponents even if the result is creating
> UI
> > to your partner".

In your comment to Eric Landau you wrote: "Ehmm... Law number please?"

Why do YOU not provide a law number where it is stated that "knowingly
creating UI" is an offence? Because you cannot?

Sven