[blml] Law 75D2 [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[richard.hills at immi.gov.au]

Paul Lamford:

[snip]

>exploiting the fact that partner would now know
>that I would have passed over a limit 3H, and
>therefore must have a marginal 3S bid, is not
>active ethics.

[snip]

Law 72A4:

When these Laws provide the innocent side with an
option after an irregularity committed by an
opponent, it is appropriate to select that action
most advantageous.

WBF Code of Practice, page 6:

A contestant may only be penalized for a lapse of
ethics where a player is in breach of the
provisions of the laws in respect of the conduct
of players. A player who has conformed to the
laws and regulations is not subject to criticism.


Best wishes

Richard James Hills, amicus curiae
Level 6 Aqua Training Suite, DIAC
02 6225 6776

Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally
privileged and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. DIAC respects your privacy and
has obligations under the Privacy Act 1988. The official departmental
privacy policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au
See: http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privacy.htm