[blml] Réf. : Re: The sixth sick sheik's sixth sheep is sick[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Herman De Wael]

Sven Pran wrote:
>> On Behalf Of Herman De Wael
> ...............
>> Sven Pran wrote:
>>> Alain Gottcheiner wrote among other things:
>>>
>>> Whenever both possible reactions (here, knowingly creating MI or
>>> knowingly creating UI) are badly wrong according to the book,
>>>
>>> My comment is plainly:
>>>
>>> I fail to see any conflict. Maybe you can enlighten me on where in the
>> laws
>>> it is stated that "knowingly creating UI" is an offence?
>>>
>> You FAIL TO SEE ANY CONFLICT?
>>
>> Blind, that's what you are.
>>
>>> According to my understanding of the laws it is the use of UI and not
>> the
>>> creation of UI that is violation of laws. Consequently (unless you can
>> point
>>> me to a law that says otherwise) the solution is crystal clear:
>>>
>> Dealt with 27 times already.
>> But I'm the one that always keeps up saying the same things, am I?
>>
>>> "Thou shalt avoid giving MI to opponents even if the result is creating
>> UI
>>> to your partner".
> 
> In your comment to Eric Landau you wrote: "Ehmm... Law number please?"
> 
> Why do YOU not provide a law number where it is stated that "knowingly
> creating UI" is an offence? Because you cannot?
> 

L73B1, L75D2

Is two enough?

> Sven
> 

-- 
Herman DE WAEL
Antwerpen Belgium
http://users.skynet.be/hermandw/index.html