[blml] Obviously this is the prime duty [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Brian]

On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:31:39 +0200
Herman De Wael <hermandw at skynet.be> wrote:

> 
> this is the argument:
> If you follow the dWS further than Herman ever intended it followed, 
> you arrive at something silly. So Herman must be wrong. Anybody spot 
> the logical fallacy here?
> 

No, because it sounds like a fairly standard application of reductio ad
absurdum to me. Why don't you see whether you can do the same for the MS
viewpoint? 

Brian. 

-- 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20071015/b48eedd7/attachment.pgp