[blml] Obviously this is the prime duty

[Matthias Berghaus]

Herman De Wael schrieb:
>
> The _without design_ falls away once you acccept that the dWS actions 
> are acceptible. Now, you DO have the choice (basically between lying 
> and speaking the truth, true)

What choice? The law tells me what to do, so I do it. Choice is not 
involved. Since I have, in fact, no choice (since I am bound by th law), 
there is no design on my part. And don`t tell me I could choose to break 
the law. This is not how anything governed by rules is played. 
Deliberate rulebreaking is out of the question.

>  and so if you CHOOSE to talk the 
> "truth", you have given UI _with design_. I can understand that you do 
> it, and I won't rule against you (more severely than I have to), but 
> you have committed an infraction nevertheless!
>
>
>