[blml] Obviously this is the prime duty

[Matthias Berghaus]

Herman De Wael schrieb:
> Matthias Berghaus wrote:
>   
>> Herman De Wael schrieb:
>>     
>>> The _without design_ falls away once you acccept that the dWS actions 
>>> are acceptible. Now, you DO have the choice (basically between lying 
>>> and speaking the truth, true)
>>>       
>> What choice? The law tells me what to do, so I do it. Choice is not 
>> involved. Since I have, in fact, no choice (since I am bound by th law), 
>> there is no design on my part. And don`t tell me I could choose to break 
>> the law. This is not how anything governed by rules is played. 
>> Deliberate rulebreaking is out of the question.
>>
>>     
>
> Indeed Matthias, and you've made it easy on me by not mentioning a law 
> number in here. I can simply insert L75D2 and this sentence could be 
> mine entirely.
>
> I choose to follow L75D2, so I believe I have no choice either!
>
>   
The difference is that the governing body has told anyone who was 
willing to listen that giving UI while answering a question is not an 
infraction, while giving MI always is an infraction. As I said above: 
choice is not involved.