[blml] Obviously this is the prime duty

[Konrad Ciborowski]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed Reppert" <ereppert at rochester.rr.com>
To: "Bridge Laws Mailing List" <blml at amsterdamned.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 2:51 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] Obviously this is the prime duty


>
> On Oct 17, 2007, at 7:22 PM, Jerry Fusselman wrote:
>
>> I fear directors would say, "well, he gave an honest answer
>> about his uncertainty, and therefore no damage is possible."
>
> Any director who would say that needs his logic engine overhauled.
>
> For legal purposes, "It could be A, or it could be B, but I don't
> know which is our actual agreement" is effectively the same as "I
> have no idea what our agreement is". It is misinformation because it
> does not disclose the actual agreement.

Huh? How can give I tell what our agreement is when I have
no idea what it is?

Konrad Ciborowski
Kraków, Poland 



----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jaros³aw Drob, Przyjdziemy i Spie***ymy - poznaj kandydata!
Kliknij >>> http://link.interia.pl/f1bef