[blml] Obviously this is the prime duty

[Konrad Ciborowski]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Gampas at aol.com>
To: <blml at amsterdamned.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:18 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] Obviously this is the prime duty


> In a message dated 18/10/2007 01:57:20 GMT Standard Time,
> dalburn at btopenworld.com writes:
>
>>I think that in Konrad's example, the 2S bid was from the partner of  the 
>>1H
>>opener, not the responder to the 1NT overcall. That is, in this  auction:
>
>>West     North      East     South
>>1H        1NT (1)   ?
>
>>(1) "He may have spades and a minor, or he may  have a strong balanced 
>>hand -
>>I don't know."
>
> Yes, I did wrongly read it as a 2S response to 1NT, which would also 
> create
> a problem of a different type. My mistake.
>
>>Should the situation arise in practice, I would have no objection if  the 
>>TD
>>were to say to North-South: "In the circumstances, I will allow  you to
>>select which of the possibilities you are going to believe, and  bid
>>accordingly."
>
> I would agree with something along those lines as the only practical
> solution.

Practical - yes. Only that, as David has pointed out, it is illegal.

Konrad Ciborowski
Kraków, Poland


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wybierz najwiekszy absurd wyborczy!
Kliknij >>> http://link.interia.pl/f1c12