[blml] Obviously this is the prime duty

[David Barton]

From: "Matthias Berghaus" <ziffbridge at t-online.de>



>>>
>>
>> If we take a different scenario - A player wishes to open 1NT and is
>> surprised
>> to see his partner alert (UI). He looks down and sees that that the 
>> bidding
>> card
>> in front of him is 2C (AI). It is well established that he can now 
>> rectify
>> his
>> mechanical error, despite the attention having been drawn to it by UI.
>>
>
> The big difference is that in 25A cases he never intended to bid what he
> actually placed on the table, while in cases of e.g. mistaken
> vulnerability he _intended_ his original bid, and now learns that he
> should have had a second look. In the first case we have a mechanical
> error, in the second a mental one. Different kettle of fish altogether.
>

Why?

What laws are you applying?

*****************************************
  david.j.barton at lineone.net
*****************************************



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.1/1078 - Release Date: 18/10/2007 17:47