[blml] Angels on the point of a needle?

[Wayne Burrows]

On 24/10/2007, Sven Pran <svenpran at online.no> wrote:
> > On Behalf Of Wayne Burrows
> ......................
> > It is others that are complaining as they do not like the implications
> > of the word 'When' in law 65A.
>
> Seems to me that your message was the first on blml about 2007 Law 65A?
>
> And if you don't complain and there has been no problem with Law 65A (at
> least) since 1987 what is then the purpose of this discussion started by you
> (AFAIK)?
>

Perhaps you should re-read the discussion.  Nigel was suggesting that
playing a card to a new trick while other players still had their
cards from the previous trick exposed was some form of harrassment.  I
merely pointed out that the infraction was keeping the cards face up
on the table or rather not turning them down "when" all four cards had
been played.

If there has been no change we can only conclude that the drafting
committee are happy with the word 'when' and its consequences.

It seems inappropriate to me that someone who has won a trick and
turned his card down at the appropriate time is criticized for leading
to the next trick.

Wayne