[blml] Double Dummy play [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Herman De Wael]

richard.hills at immi.gov.au wrote:
> Grattan Endicott (WBF CoP co-author), 5th June 2007:
> 
> " ... There is no *design* to convey UI when a player
> answers a question that the laws require him to answer.
>                                          Grattan ~   +=+"
> 
> Herman De Wael:
> 
>> Well, if a blml-reader is asked this question, he should
>> realize that L75D2 requires him to lie about it.
>>
>> Therefore, if he speaks (what is called by Richard et.
>> al.) "the truth", he is conveying UI _with design_, and
>> no Australian official is going to convince me otherwise.
> 
> Richard Hills:
> 
> To the best of my knowledge and belief, Grattan Endicott
> is not an Australian official.
> 
> :-)
> 

Richard, please keep up with the discussion. YOU, the Australian 
official alluded to, are using Grattan's words to prove a point.

I, the Belgian TD that's handling your case, am not doubting the 
validity of Grattan's words, but of your application thereof. Grattan 
speaks of people who do something without design. I tell you that I 
don't admit that you call what you do _without design_.

So please counter that argument and don't go throwing about funny 
remarks just to confuse the issue.

You have not responded to my argument - so I stop that discussion.

-- 
Herman DE WAEL
Antwerpen Belgium
http://users.skynet.be/hermandw/index.html