[blml] Double Dummy play [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[richard.hills at immi.gov.au]

John Probst on blml's usefulness to the WBF Laws Committee:

>That blml should be seen by the WBFLC as a mild thorn in their side is IMO
>a good thing. It brings an element of "being seen to be rational" to their

>deliberations. I believe they should welcome it, problems indeed that it
>might create.  john

Grattan Endicott concurred (17th July 2007):

>> ... Much occasions no more than a wry smile and the delete button, but
>>occasionally, one could say rarely, amongst the slurry one catches the
>>sparkle of a tiny diamond to be sieved, washed, cut and polished.
>>                                                        ~ Grattan ~   +=+


Best wishes

Richard James Hills, amicus curiae
Level 6 Aqua Training Suite, DIAC
02 6225 6776

Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally
privileged and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. DIAC respects your privacy and
has obligations under the Privacy Act 1988. The official departmental
privacy policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au
See: http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privacy.htm