[blml] San Diego Lightfoot Sue [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Jerry Fusselman]

On 9/7/07, Grattan Endicott <grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>
> +=+ My initial reaction is that the AC should have been
> instructed as to the law by the Director, who should then
> have refused to impose a penalty for a supposed offence
> which in law was not an offence. Am I missing something?
>                                  ~ Grattan ~   +=+
>

At the end of the appeal process, the director may (or must?) override
an AC's final decision that imposes a penalty whenever the director
decides there was no offense?  This is in the law book?  Has it ever
happened in the ACBL?

Jerry Fusselman