[blml] San Diego Lightfoot Sue [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Sven Pran]

> On Behalf Of Jerry Fusselman
> On 9/7/07, Grattan Endicott <grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > +=+ My initial reaction is that the AC should have been
> > instructed as to the law by the Director, who should then
> > have refused to impose a penalty for a supposed offence
> > which in law was not an offence. Am I missing something?
> >                                  ~ Grattan ~   +=+
> >
> 
> At the end of the appeal process, the director may (or must?) override
> an AC's final decision that imposes a penalty whenever the director
> decides there was no offense?  This is in the law book?  Has it ever
> happened in the ACBL?

I hope not; I think this would be improper by the Director. What he can do
is to recommend a further appeal to the National Authority. (Assuming of
course that he during the appeal process has reminded the AC about Law 93B3
if he feels that Law applicable)

Regards Sven