[blml] Réf. : Re: Lead penalty

[Alain Gottcheiner]

-------Message original-------
 
So the best solution it to ask IBer what he intended, and then apply
L26A on that one.
 
AG : I don't like this. It means we're creating more UI than there was. If
we take steps to avoid the IBer telling other players (by taking one away
from the table), we nevertheless reveal the information by our ruling.
 
And it doesn't cover a frequent case :
 
- What were you intending to bid ?
- Well, 2D. I didn't realize this was an insufficient bid.
- Okay, but what did you intend to mean by your bid ?
- Sorry, there is no specific meaning for IBs in our system.
 
Neither does it cover the Chimp's case :
 
- What were you intending to bid ?
- Well, I'm a bit ashamed to admit it, but I was thinking about the last
deal, where I'd have been better off had I opened 1D, and I mechanically
pulled 1D out of the BB, without any relation to my hand.
 
Best regards
 
  Alain
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070920/f0a97c5e/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070920/f0a97c5e/attachment-0001.jpeg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 35396 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070920/f0a97c5e/attachment-0001.gif