[blml] Appeal by a Director [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[richard.hills at immi.gov.au]

Eric Landau:

>>only the CTD (DIC in ACBL-speak) is "the Director" in
>>the sense that TFLB uses the term; other TDs at the
>>event are "assistants" who may carry out only those
>>duties "delegated" by the CTD [L81].

Grattan Endicott:

>+=+ I agree.             ~ Grattan ~  +=+

Richard Hills:

I too agree that the "Director in charge" is deemed to
be the "Director" for the purposes of the Lawbook.

But, for the sake of tying up a loose end, I also note
that the "Director in charge" has an untrammelled right
under Law to send an appeal to the National Authority.

Law 81C9 (Director's Duties and Powers - Disputes):

"The Director's duties and powers normally include the
following: to adjust disputes; to refer a matter to the
appropriate committee."


Best wishes

Richard James Hills, amicus curiae
Level 6 Aqua Training Suite, DIAC
02 6225 6776

Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally
privileged and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. DIAC respects your privacy and
has obligations under the Privacy Act 1988. The official departmental
privacy policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au
See: http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privacy.htm