[blml] A Psyche Classification
Gampas at aol.com
Gampas at aol.com
Fri Sep 21 05:41:10 CEST 2007
Dealer North – Love All
North
Scoring:
Hybrid
K 9 7 3
6 4
K 10 5
K Q 9 7
.
J 6 4 2 A 5
K J 10 7 5 3 Q 9 8 2
9 Q 8 6 3 2
6 3 10 4
Q 10 8
A
A J 7 4
A J 8 5 2
West North East South
Pass Pass Pass 1C
2H Dble* 2S 3D
Pass 4C 4H 5C
Pass Pass Pass
2H was weak; *alerted, ‘likely’ to have four spades
Result: 5C - 1 by South = -50
Tournament Director’s comments: I feel this is close to being Amber –
although pass may be the advisable action, many players would have raised spades,
and West must have been aware that this is a potential psyche situation. I
ruled the psyche GREEN.
The above was a psyche in the Pachabo in England, originally ruled green by
the TD and reclassified by the L&E as red. It would seem from later minutes
that East-West produced the opinion of three Grandmasters who would all have
passed on the West hand. East-West submitted arguments that 2S implied a heart
fit (it is clearly fit non jump to any average plus player), and pass
therefore showed a minimum. I would tend to agree with them - West knows that it is
not their hand, and raising spades will only help North-South diagnose a
double fit, when East-West may have to save at the five (or even six) level.
I can understand that antipathy towards "nasty, dirty, horrible" psyches
generates this type of verdict. I would however, have reclassified it as amber,
rather than green. It is a common psyche situation, and the benefit of the
doubt has to be given to the opponents of the pair who psyched. After the red
classification there should have been a score adjustment when South had gone
off in a cold game, although I did not see this adjustment in the L&E minutes.
How would others have classified it?
More information about the blml
mailing list