[blml] A Psyche Classification
Guthrie
guthrie at ntlworld.com
Fri Sep 21 13:09:01 CEST 2007
[Paul Lamford]
Dealer North Love All North Scoring: Hybrid
............. K 9 7 3
............. 6 4
............. K 10 5
............. K Q 9 7
J 6 4 2 ................... A 5
K J 10 7 5 3 .............. Q 9 8 2
9 ......................... Q 8 6 3 2
6 3 ....................... 10 4
............. Q 10 8
............. A
............. A J 7 4
............. A J 8 5 2
_W _N _E _S
_P _P _P 1C
2H X* 2S 3D
_P 4C 4H 5C
AP
2H was weak; *alerted, "likely to have four spades"
Result: 5C - 1 by South = -50
Tournament Director's comments: I feel this is close to being Amber
although pass may be the advisable action, many players would have
raised spades, and West must have been aware that this is a potential
psyche situation. I ruled the psyche GREEN.
The above was a psyche in the Pachabo in England, originally ruled
green by the TD and reclassified by the L&E as red. It would seem
from later minutes that East-West produced the opinion of three
Grandmasters who would all have passed on the West hand. East-West
submitted arguments that 2S implied a heart fit (it is clearly fit non
jump to any average plus player), and pass therefore showed a minimum.
I would tend to agree with them - West knows that it is not their
hand, and raising spades will only help North-South diagnose a double
fit, when East-West may have to save at the five (or even six) level.
I can understand that antipathy towards "nasty, dirty, horrible"
psyches generates this type of verdict. I would however, have
reclassified it as amber, rather than green. It is a common psyche
situation, and the benefit of the doubt has to be given to the
opponents of the pair who psyched. After the red classification there
should have been a score adjustment when South had gone off in a cold
game, although I did not see this adjustment in the L&E minutes.
How would others have classified it?
[Richard Hills snipped]
As I have noted many times before, the correct nomenclature is "common
pseudo-psyche situation". If in that partnership they have an
implicit partnership understanding to commonly use so-called "baby
psyches", then 2S was actually a "baby pseudo-psyche" and a concealed
partnership understanding (CPU) infraction of Law 40B.
Therefore, in my opinion, the EBU Laws and Ethics Committee decision
to reclassify the 2S bid as a "Red Psyche" (accurate nomenclature
would be "Red Alleged Psyche") was justified by the available facts.
{nige1]
I've also proposed a vocabulary for describing psychs several times
here and elsewhere.
Richard advocates the mainstream definition: "deliberate gross
departure from agreed methods".
I prefer the EBU interpretation which seems to be: "deliberate gross
departure from disclosed methods." I also feel that the word *gross*
should be dropped.
My reason for preferring the EBU interpretation is that it is more
practical. For example, it provides a concise description of what
happened at the table here:
(Digression: Opener's pass may be tactically correct although, if
responder's 2S is a fit nonjump, systemically, then perhaps 2S should
be alerted. However, let us assume the pass was antisystemic for the
purposes of this argument. Anyway Richard and I both feel that East
and West made antisystemic bids. They both psyched in the EBU sense).
If East pass is a "psych" then it could just be coincidence. But a
suspicious director may consider it as evidence for a concealed
partnership understanding or unauthorised information -- which would
make West's earlier 2S "psych" a proper *Richard psych*.
Richard's definition of "psych" is no use for concisely describing
events until *after* the ruling. Even then, unless the pair confess,
the designation will still be a matter of subjective judgement. Hence,
to accuse a pair of a "Richard Psych" is a potential libel.
The "EBU red psych" is nearly equivalent to a "Richard psych" -- but
not quite. The red-psych classification is statistical not absolute so
less offensive and more useful.
I agree with Richard that the EBU was right to reclassify this "psych"
as red.
More information about the blml
mailing list