[blml] A Psyche Classification
Gampas at aol.com
Gampas at aol.com
Fri Sep 21 17:05:23 CEST 2007
In a message dated 21/09/2007 14:57:14 GMT Standard Time, john at asimere.com
writes:
>Why should West, when he knows opponents have game values assist the
>opponents to diagnose a 4-1 spade fit and thus assess game as more >likely?
The opponent looking at the singleton spade and hearing the negative double
is aware of the 4-1 fit, unless he needs a visit to Specsavers.
>Why should West when he knows his side are seriously outgunned, try a
>4-4 spade fit when he knows spades are breaking badly?
It is presumably a 5-4 fit, as what reason would East have for bidding a
four-card suit.
>Why should West want to commit unassisted suicide? suicide is also an
infraction >of law in England. ye gods, Pass is obvious. and DALB is (and I know
him well >enough to say it) being ridiculous here. Were the West hand better,
a 2S call>(against a known 4-1 break) is still crazy, but I might rule an
amber.
>What do I know; I'm not a Grandmaster.? John
The clear purpose of raising it to tell partner of the double-fit so that
partner can make a lawful decision. Clearly raising is lawful and passing is
unlawful and the L&E correctly ruled so. As all can see I have completely
changed sides on this one!
More information about the blml
mailing list