[blml] A Psyche Classification
John Probst
john at asimere.com
Mon Sep 24 05:17:29 CEST 2007
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim West-Meads" <twm at cix.co.uk>
To: <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 12:24 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] A Psyche Classification
> Any talk of a "red psych" is the work of a drivelling idiot.
>
> *If* it is determined that the pair has an agreement to play 2S as
> showing "H support or S" or "A useful card in S + H support" or indeed
> *anything* else that agreement is 100% legal according to OB regulations.
> There may be a failure to disclose on the CC and/or a failure to alert
> the 2S requiring redress for NOS (both may also be subject to a pp for
> wilful non-disclosure if deemed appropriate).
>
> If no such agreement is deemed to exist then it's a green psych.
>
> FWIW I'd incline towards the player having taken a view based on his
> general experience rather than partnership knowledge.
>
Thank the Lord for another voice in the wilderness. John
> Tim
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blml mailing list
> blml at amsterdamned.org
> http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
More information about the blml
mailing list