[blml] Interaction between L27B1 and L10C1

John (MadDog) Probst john at asimere.com
Tue Apr 1 23:41:05 CEST 2008


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stefanie Rohan" <daisy_duck at btopenworld.com>
To: "Bridge Laws Mailing List" <blml at amsterdamned.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 2:24 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] Interaction between L27B1 and L10C1


>
> The only difference is that the two players have imagined different
> auctions. But neither of  these existed in reality. An auction that exists
> only in a player's mind cannot possibly have a bearing on a ruling, or
> indeed, on anything. So long as no revealing UI is made available at the
> table by the IBer or the director, there is no basis for different 
> rulings.
> God, at least I hope not!

I agree in principle, Stef, but in practice there will almost always be UI. 
You have to be a chairleg not to notice a flinch; raised eyebrow or some 
such.  John

>
> Stefanie Rohan
> London, England
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blml mailing list
> blml at amsterdamned.org
> http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml 





More information about the blml mailing list