[blml] Is investigation needed after this incident?
Robin Barker
Robin.Barker at npl.co.uk
Wed Apr 2 13:12:08 CEST 2008
From: Alain Gottcheiner
> >
> > Easy, 1C(art)-1H(nat)-1S(ask)-2D(2 of HAKQ) and opener has 2 of HAKQ
>
> Interesting. Notice that it doesn't mean *partner* has forgotten his
> system, but I imagine a bid meaning "your last bid is impossible IMHO
> because there are only 4 aces / 3 tops / 12 controls, please reconsider"
> would be legal.
The only real difference for this system is who will place the final contract.
What about the legality of?
3C I think we disagree or are about to disagree about the system.
I think I have gone wrong: please place the final contract.
3D I think we disagree or are about to disagree about the system.
I think you have gone wrong: please let me place the final contract.
Robin
More information about the blml
mailing list