[blml] Is investigation needed after this incident?

Robin Barker Robin.Barker at npl.co.uk
Wed Apr 2 13:12:08 CEST 2008



From: Alain Gottcheiner
> >
> > Easy, 1C(art)-1H(nat)-1S(ask)-2D(2 of HAKQ) and opener has 2 of HAKQ
> 
> Interesting. Notice that it doesn't mean *partner* has forgotten his 
> system, but I imagine a bid meaning "your last bid is impossible IMHO 
> because there are only 4 aces / 3 tops / 12 controls, please reconsider" 
> would be legal. 

The only real difference for this system is who will place the final contract.

What about the legality of?

3C	I think we disagree or are about to disagree about the system.
	I think I have gone wrong: please place the final contract.

3D 	I think we disagree or are about to disagree about the system.
	I think you have gone wrong: please let me place the final contract.

Robin


More information about the blml mailing list