[blml] Is investigation needed after this incident?
richard willey
richard.willey at gmail.com
Wed Apr 2 20:58:39 CEST 2008
> What has agreeing or disagreeing about system to do with it?
>
> 3C: Asks partner to place the contract; 3C bidder will pass whatever
> pard bids next.
>
> 3D: Relay to 3H; makes 3D bidder's next bid strictly to play.
>
> Those agreements might even be useful when there is no reason to
> think anyone has forgotten anything. Why would anyone even think
> they might be illegal?
Funny that:
Many relay systems use a conventional 4D response once shape is
completely known. 4D requires that parter rebid 4H. This bid is
known by a variety of names including the "End Signal" and "Terminator
Puppet"
(If we want to be pendantic, there are some occasions where RR can
break the end signal and bid past 4H with an exception hand - extra
strength, lots of extra controls, whatever. However, there are a
number of occasions where this type of break is impossible - RR has a
limited hand or some such)
--
I think back to the halcyon dates of my youth, when indeterminant
Hessians had something to do with the Revolutionary War, where
conjugate priors were monks who had broken their vows, and the
expression (X'X)^-1(X'Y) was greek
Those were simpler times
More information about the blml
mailing list