[blml] ACBL LC Detroit minutes
Alain Gottcheiner
agot at ulb.ac.be
Fri Apr 4 16:47:02 CEST 2008
Robert Frick a écrit :
>
>
> I think the point is that if you don't have any forcing opening bids, you
> cannot describe a 1 Spade opening as showing 12-21 HCP, even if that is
> your partnership agreement.
>
Absolutely right. But my point was to say that even regular partnerships
could have big holes in their system. Apparently some didn't imagine this.
Let me give another example : if you're allowed, in your system, to
open 1NT on, say, 2326 pattern, you could be compelled to be incomplete
thereafter, and answer "doubleton diamond" to partner's relay, not
showing the doubleton in spades. Partner will know this, of course, and
will explain "doubleton diamond". He will be careful not to say "3325",
and clever opponents will be wary of deducing 3325. There shan't be any
ethical problems about that. But in all honesty, yuo don't have any way
in your system to pattern out 2326. So what ? If a TD penalized me for
that, I would be a bit confused.
Best regards
Alain
More information about the blml
mailing list