[blml] ACBL LC Detroit minutes
Herman De Wael
hermandw at skynet.be
Mon Apr 7 10:14:10 CEST 2008
While I agree with Nigel 100% (well, I'm going to disagree with
something, so I'd better make it only 99%), there is one thing he
needs to take into account:
Guthrie wrote:
>
> [Nigel]
> As expected, Grattan is right in law. Nevertheless, I agree with Herman
> de Wael that these inferences should be divulged. I go further than
> Herman. IMO.
> - There should be a law that forbids prevarication.
> - The "bridge knowledge" get-out should be expunged.
>
If that clause is indeed taken out of the laws, we get players calling
the TD saying "he did not tell me ...", when such a thing would be
general bridge knowledge under any definition. When I answer
"Stayman", I am relying on my opponents knowing the term. I need a law
that protects me from their later saying they do not know this, or
else I'll be forced to explain everything starting with "an ace being
worth 4 points, ...".
No Nigel, that clause is needed; but as I said, I agree that it needs
to be used with care.
--
Herman DE WAEL
Antwerpen Belgium
http://users.skynet.be/hermandw/index.html
More information about the blml
mailing list