[blml] ACBL LC Detroit minutes

[Alain Gottcheiner]

Eric Landau a écrit :
> Possibly never.  You can't hide behind "no agreement" just because  
> you have no specific agreement about the particular call in  
> question.  If you are disclosing ethically, "no agreement" should  
> mean that you have no agreement whatsoever that might be potentially  
> useful in determining what the call in question might mean.  IOW, it  
> should be the same as "I haven't got the foggiest clue" -- and if  
> that's the case, you're better off saying it outright.
>
>   
Okay, I can accept that. Now, am I thereafter allowed to guess right or 
not ? Remember, that was the initial question.