[blml] The real issue of "no agreement" [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
David Burn
dalburn at btopenworld.com
Thu Apr 24 04:13:57 CEST 2008
[HdW]
In the DWS case, I refuse to give UI, and you lambast me for it. Yet in this
case you have an NBO who expressely tells you to hide valuable information
to opponents, in order not to give UI.
[DALB]
It seems to me that many, if not all, of the problems we have been
discussing here would vanish if it were recognised that the creation of UI
is never a crime, whereas allowing oneself to be influenced by UI into
taking an action one would not otherwise have taken is always a crime.
Come to think of it, if this principle were universally adopted, BLML would
soon cease to exist. Unless, of course, the WBFLC created other stupid Laws.
David Burn
London, England
More information about the blml
mailing list