[blml] 27B1(b) cases and misbids.

Tony Musgrove ardelm at optusnet.com.au
Sat Apr 26 02:33:14 CEST 2008


At 01:03 AM 26/04/2008, you wrote:
>[Max quoted by Grattan]
>Just to double check that we are now in total agreement. 2D
>opening - 1H undercall. 1H is artificial showing a balanced
>13-17. Replaced with 2NT showing a balanced 15-17
>(assume this is OK for the sake of the example).
>
>i) responder raises to game with his 10 count. Game makes.
>The overcaller has only 13 points. Outcome; they've got lucky
>- score stands.
>
>ii) responder passes with his 10 count. Game doesn't make.
>Outcome; regardless of whether the overcaller has his bid or
>not, the score is adjusted to game going off.

So should I as director, explain at the table, "I am allowing
a change without penalty to 2NT however you (IB's
partner) must carefully ignore the attempted insufficient
bid of 1H and whatever point range that may have shown"

Surely, I cannot adjust the final score without some sort
of table blurb at the time of the offence about L27D

Cheers
Tony (Sydney)




More information about the blml mailing list