[blml] (pas de sujet)

[Alain Gottcheiner]

Guthrie a écrit :
> [Max quoted by Grattan]
> Just to double check that we are now in total agreement. 2D
> opening - 1H undercall. 1H is artificial showing a balanced
> 13-17. Replaced with 2NT showing a balanced 15-17
> (assume this is OK for the sake of the example).
>
> i) responder raises to game with his 10 count. Game makes.
> The overcaller has only 13 points. Outcome; they've got lucky
> - score stands.
>
> ii) responder passes with his 10 count. Game doesn't make.
> Outcome; regardless of whether the overcaller has his bid or
> not, the score is adjusted to game going off.
>
> When I come to writing up my notes for the Zone 1 lecture,
> I'm hoping beyond hope that everyone already understands
> 27B1(a) as this is effectively the same as the old 1997 law.
> However, from some things I've read of late from other parts
> of the world, I'm not entirely convinced that such is the case.
> Of course we never discuss these things at International
> tournaments because we have screens so the situation never
> arises.
>
> [Alain Gottcheiner]
> AG : don't agree. At the moment the player decided to bid 1H, he decided
> his hand was worth 15. So the adjustment shouldn't be on the basis of
> "help from the IB", but on "fielded the underbid, had a CPU that 1H was
> in fact less than announced".
>
> [Nige1]
> I hope it's your turn for a misreading, Alain :( 
I read 15-17 in both cases ... I'm notoriously long-sighted.