[blml] L93 Why "Director in charge"?

[gesta at tiscali.co.uk]

Grattan Endicott<gesta at tiscali.co.uk
[following address discontinued:
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk]
*******************************
"Continuing to do the same thing 
 hoping for a different outcome."
           Einstein: definition of madness. 
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Geller" <geller at nifty.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] L93 Why "Director in charge"?


>  (3) the fact that some people did or didn't discuss 
> this question in relation to the 1997 laws is of interest, 
> but doesn't change the fact that the 2007 laws should 
> be an internally consistent document that speaks for 
> itself.
> 
+=+ Using this argument we can then agree that 
'Director in charge' says something different from 
simply 'Director'.  We might thus imagine that the 
WBFLC could interpret that the power to delegate 
attributed to the Director is not available to the  
'Director in charge' under Law 93?
                                 ~ G ~   +=+