[blml] L93 Why "Director in charge"?

Robert Geller geller at nifty.com
Sat Feb 2 15:49:44 CET 2008


The laws should be based on statements in
black and white, and should not require any "imagination"
to interpret them properly.

if it was desired that the Director in Charge be forbidden
to delegate L93 duties it should have been clearly
stated in L93 that L81D was inapplicable to duties
assigned to the Director in Charge under L93.
In the absence of such a clear statement L81D 
is clearly applicable to all duties of the Director
(in charge), including those assigned under L93.

May I suggest that in the future the WBFLCDSC should
write things down, rather than leaving them to the 
imagination of the reader.

Incidentally, can anyone who plays regularly in ACBL 
tourneys please tell us whether the director in charge
personally handles duties under L93, or whether he
assigns them to an assistant.   I strongly suspect (in
view of the scale of the tourney) that the latter is 
the case.

-Bob
 

gesta at tiscali.co.uk さんは書きました:
>
>Grattan Endicott<gesta at tiscali.co.uk
>[following address discontinued:
>grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk]
>*******************************
>"Continuing to do the same thing 
> hoping for a different outcome."
>           Einstein: definition of madness. 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Robert Geller" <geller at nifty.com>
>Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 11:05 AM
>Subject: Re: [blml] L93 Why "Director in charge"?
>
>
>>  (3) the fact that some people did or didn't discuss 
>> this question in relation to the 1997 laws is of interest, 
>> but doesn't change the fact that the 2007 laws should 
>> be an internally consistent document that speaks for 
>> itself.
>> 
>+=+ Using this argument we can then agree that 
>'Director in charge' says something different from 
>simply 'Director'.  We might thus imagine that the 
>WBFLC could interpret that the power to delegate 
>attributed to the Director is not available to the  
>'Director in charge' under Law 93?
>                                 ~ G ~   +=+
>
>_______________________________________________
>blml mailing list
>blml at amsterdamned.org
>http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml

-----------------------------------------------------
Robert (Bob) Geller,     Tokyo, Japan        geller at nifty.com



More information about the blml mailing list