[blml] ABF seminar - Law 27C [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[richard.hills at immi.gov.au]

Jerry Fusselman:

[snip]

>Then there is the question of how perfect the incorporation must be.
>Absolutely perfect A + B = B is probably quite rare, but the law
>makers gave us a glimpse of their intention (a few weeks ago) that the
>new law should allow more corrections than the old law. (That kind of
>glimpse is both rare and helpful.)  This apparently means that A + B =
>B is not a strict requirement.  Again, a rewording or a clarification
>is in order.

Richard Hills:

Apparently means?  I do not think Jerry's conclusion follows from his
premise since the old Law 27 test was "non-conventional" while the new
Law 27 test is "incorporates".

It is possible that the law makers believe that a strict requirement of
A + B = B under the 2007 Law 27 causes the insufficient bidder's
partner to be barred less often than for the strict requirement of non-
conventional under the 1997 Law 27.


Best wishes

Richard James Hills
Governance & Graduates Section
National Training Branch
Department of Immigration and Citizenship
Telephone: 02 6223 8439
Email: richard.hills at immi.gov.au

Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally
privileged and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. DIAC respects your privacy and
has obligations under the Privacy Act 1988. The official departmental
privacy policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au
See: http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privacy.htm