[blml] Are opponents entitled to knowing about the misunderstanding?

[gesta at tiscali.co.uk]

Grattan Endicott<gesta at tiscali.co.uk
[following address discontinued:
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk]
*****************************
"In situations where a misexplanation 
has been given by partner a player 
must not indicate that partner has made 
a mistake. However, in his own 
explanations the player is obliged to state
 the partnership agreement correctly. 
Knowing this, it is the gravest possible 
violation of law to deceive opponent by 
not doing so."
   ~ Grattan Endicott, (2002 - paraphrase)

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Herman De Wael" <hermandw at skynet.be>
To: "blml" <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 9:34 AM
Subject: [blml] Are opponents entitled to knowing 
                                  about the misunderstanding?


> In the course of my considerations regarding DWS in the last few 
> weeks, I have been constructing a full case, and it turns out it means 
> we have to discuss something far more important than the DWS.
> 
+=+ 'we have to' - really?  "My dear, I don't care a damn." +=+