[blml] Are opponents entitled to knowing about themisunderstanding?
Stefanie Rohan
daisy_duck at btopenworld.com
Sat Feb 9 01:41:10 CET 2008
(About the five tables)
[HDW]
I would say that the normal ending of the story at tables 1-5 would be that
West would pass 5Di (not knowing about the misunderstanding and thus
believing that South bid his longest minor). North would of course have to
pass, and the AS would be 5D-3, -300.
[SR]
This story does not address the "lack of consistency" you cite, because the
normal ending, as long as the opponents are all informed at the end of the
hand that they have been given misinformation, is that they will say that
they would have doubled 5D. At all tables the "Blackwood" explainers will go
for 800. So it is not such a great example.
Though it does, as DALB notes, highlight the danger of a dWSist who forgets
to mention the misinformation.
Stefanie Rohan
London, England
More information about the blml
mailing list