[blml] Are opponents entitled to knowing about the misunderstanding?

[Herman De Wael]

David Burn wrote:
> [HdW]
> 
> 
> [DALB]
> 
> No, you don't. At the table where you were North, you were plus 500 against
> five spades doubled. And you would have remained plus 500 against five
> spades doubled unless East-West worked out that they needed to call the
> Director.
> 

This is the most spurious argument ever. I have stated quite often 
that I will clear up any misunderstanding after the hand. If you 
continue to question my ethics, I will not read any more of your 
highly entertaining posts.

-- 
Herman DE WAEL
Antwerpen Belgium
http://users.skynet.be/hermandw/index.html