[blml] Amended L27C1/27C2 question

[Robert Geller]

Sorry, my bad.    I wasn't thinking or writing clearly.  What I should have
said was,  if we change the circumstances of the actually example in
several ways it can (perhaps) serve as the basis for a hypothetical 
question.   Please delete the previous example and let me start over again.


IMPS, Dlr E, None Vul
	South
	S Kxxx
	H KTxx
	D x
	CAQxx
Q1. Let's look only at the South cards for a moment,  
Suppose East opens 1D and, not having seen it, South then makes
an insufficient bid of 1C, not accepted by West.   If he then changes this
to 2C, should the 2C call be regarded as "incorporating the information 
contained in the insufficient bid" (1C)?    

If the answer to Q1 is no presumably 27D1 then applies and we can stop here.
But if the answer to Q1 is yes then presumably the auction is allowed
to continue for the moment.  

Suppose the North hand is
	North
	S AQx
	H 98x
	D KTxx
	C K9x.  
Q2a. If West passes, North bids 2NT and South raises to 3NT, which happens
to make, should this result be rectified under 27C2?   Does the answer 
depend on the quality of the EW defense?

Q2b. If West passes, North bids 2NT and South passes, and 2NT happens
to make, should this result be rectified under 27C2?   Does the answer 
depend on the quality of the EW defense?

Q2c. If West passes, North bids 3NT and South passes, and 3NT happens
to make, should this result be rectified under 27C2?   Does the answer 
depend on the quality of the EW defense?


 

-----------------------------------------------------
Robert (Bob) Geller,     Tokyo, Japan        geller at nifty.com