[blml] Amended L27C1/27C2 question

[Sven Pran]

> On Behalf Of Robert Geller
> A 1C open promises opening bid strength, but may show only 3 (2) cards
> in clubs.   OTH a 2C overcall of 1D should show at least a good 5 card
> suit,
> but might be less than opening bid strength.  Thus it isn't clear to me
> that
> when South changes his insufficient 1C (intended as an opener) to 2C
> that the 2C call "incorporating the information
> contained in the insufficient bid."
> 
> I suppose we'll have to wait for the wisdom of the WBFLC on the
> meaning of "incorporate."

Precisely.

But the way I have previously understood the intention it is not necessary
that the replacement bid alone makes the situation clear to North
immediately if North/South have in their system methods available that
eventually will bring them to the favourable contract without North using
any of the information specific to the retracted insufficient bid as such.

Regards Sven