[blml] Amended L27C1/27C2 question
Robert Geller
geller at nifty.com
Mon Feb 11 00:14:07 CET 2008
This is a delicate issue, and many of our relatively less experienced
directors will have a tough time sorting this out.... I hope the WBFLC
provides good rules.
-Bob
Sven Pran さんは書きました:
>> On Behalf Of Robert Geller
>> A 1C open promises opening bid strength, but may show only 3 (2) cards
>> in clubs. OTH a 2C overcall of 1D should show at least a good 5 card
>> suit,
>> but might be less than opening bid strength. Thus it isn't clear to me
>> that
>> when South changes his insufficient 1C (intended as an opener) to 2C
>> that the 2C call "incorporating the information
>> contained in the insufficient bid."
>>
>> I suppose we'll have to wait for the wisdom of the WBFLC on the
>> meaning of "incorporate."
>
>Precisely.
>
>But the way I have previously understood the intention it is not necessary
>that the replacement bid alone makes the situation clear to North
>immediately if North/South have in their system methods available that
>eventually will bring them to the favourable contract without North using
>any of the information specific to the retracted insufficient bid as such.
>
>Regards Sven
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>blml mailing list
>blml at amsterdamned.org
>http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
-----------------------------------------------------
Robert (Bob) Geller, Tokyo, Japan geller at nifty.com
More information about the blml
mailing list