[blml] Return to Oz

[Wayne Burrows]

On 15/02/2008, gesta at tiscali.co.uk <gesta at tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Grattan Endicott<gesta at tiscali.co.uk
> [following address discontinued:
> grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk]
> *****************************
> "When my stick touches the air,
>  you play."
>                 ~ Serge Koussevitzky
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Landau" <ehaa at starpower.net>
> To: "Bridge Laws Mailing List" <blml at amsterdamned.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 9:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [blml] Return to Oz
>
>
> >
> > American Heritage Dictionary gives:
> >
> > "Demonstrable: Capable of being shown or proved."
> >
> > "Arguable: That can be argued about."
> >
> > Of course, BLMLers know quite well from experience
> > that even that which is proven can be argued about
> > anyhow, but I'll stick by "antonym".
> >
> +=+ How natural to argue here about what is arguable.
>                                              ~ G ~  +=+

I thought that was the definition.  If it is here it is arguable.

Wayne