[blml] A new fun game - Alain's contribution

[Alain Gottcheiner]

Tony Musgrove a écrit :
> At 10:59 AM 19/02/2008, you wrote:
>   
>> 2D-2NT
>> 2S
>>
>> 2D: weak two
>> 2NT asking for a side ace or king if maximum.
>> 2S: spade ace or king, but heavily caffeine depleted ;-)
>>
>> Again this needs investigating by the TD away from the table.
>>     
>
> I never allow these to be changed under L25A. I think that they
> almost always work out what suit to bid and then just get the
> number wrong.  However, I think the new laws want to
> allow a change to 3S without penalty.  The old laws would
> not.
>   
Why wouldn't they ? The S bid is natural in both cases, being related to 
honor strength in the named suit.
This was the test in old L27B1A.


Bst regards

   Alain