[blml] re claim. CORRECTION.
Ed Reppert
ereppert at rochester.rr.com
Tue Jan 1 01:48:16 CET 2008
On Dec 31, 2007, at 7:30 PM, Sven Pran wrote:
> The easy way to remember this is to treat him as the offending side,
So, he's not an offender, we just treat him like he's one? Huh.
I don't seem to have any trouble remembering that he's not an
offender, and has not committed an offense, but we nonetheless give
the benefit of the doubt when adjudicating his claim to his opponent
(which is what the law actually *says*, after all).
More information about the blml
mailing list