[blml] concession

[Sven Pran]

> On Behalf Of ton
> As you may expect I try to understand this topic, so read some more mails.
> 
> Do I have to believe that somebody is trying to tell us that L68B2 only
> applies for a defender who concedes all remaining tricks?

Yes
 
> May I ask David to find the word describing the quality of that opinion?
> 
> How is it possible to read 'if a defender attempts to concede one or more
> tricks...' in such a way?

It is indeed impossible. 

But they base their opinion on the omission of the words "or claim" from
L68B2 and claim that as a consequence any implied claim has indeed occurred
and must be handled in the regular way even when the other defender has
objected to the concession which therefore "has not occurred".

Regards Sven