[blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Herman De Wael]

gesta at tiscali.co.uk wrote:
> Grattan Endicott<gesta at tiscali.co.uk
> [following address discontinued:
> grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk]
> ***********************
> "We do not want those who are 
> illegally in the country in Culpeper.
> It's not meant to be mean-spirited, 
> it's not against any nationality, any 
> race, it's not against any socio -economic 
> factors. It's about what is legal and 
> what is illegal - and to me it's very 
> black and white."
>          Steve Jenkins (Culpeper VA.) 
> has a problem with Hispanic incomers. 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Herman De Wael" <hermandw at skynet.be>
> To: "Bridge Laws Mailing List" <blml at amsterdamned.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 9:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
> 
> 
>>> Richard Hills:
>>>
>>> The 2007 Law 40A3 (and 40A1(b) also) make the De 
>>> Wael School
>>> illegal. 
>> Let's read 2007L40A3 then:
>>
>> A player may make any call or play without prior
>> announcement provided that such call or play is not 
>> based on an undisclosed partnership understanding 
>> (see Law 40C1).
>>
>> I see nothing therein about explaining.
>>
>> I stop this discussion right now.
>>
> +=+ I am glad about this. Among WBFLC members 
> the most frequently cited example of the low quality 
> of debate in this forum is the argument of the DWS 
> school. Members of the WBFLC consider it unworthy 
> of response.

Completely strange!
I really would like half an hour in front of you guys to explain why 
not only am I not wrong, but even completely right! The dWS is the 
logical consequence of the way bridge should be played, in 1997 lawes 
or earlier or later.
I really hope to be able to convince you guys.

I thought I had gotten there with you, Grattan, in Antalya. You seemed 
to understand what I was trying to say!

>                          ~ Grattan ~   +=+
> 


-- 
Herman DE WAEL
Antwerpen Belgium
http://users.skynet.be/hermandw/index.html