[blml] Correction of a revoke

[gesta at tiscali.co.uk]

Grattan Endicott<gesta at tiscali.co.uk
[following address discontinued:
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk]
***********************
"We do not want those who are 
illegally in the country in Culpeper.
It's not meant to be mean-spirited, 
it's not against any nationality, any 
race, it's not against any socio -economic 
factors. It's about what is legal and 
what is illegal - and to me it's very 
black and white."
         Steve Jenkins (Culpeper VA.) 
has a problem with Hispanic incomers. 
+++++++++++++++++++++++
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Konrad Ciborowski" <cibor at poczta.fm>
To: <blml at amsterdamned.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 12:37 PM
Subject: [blml] Correction of a revoke


This law also existed in the previous version

L64B4

There is no rectification as in A following an established revoke:


Wow!! In all team matches that I play (even in the First Division)
players get the hand records no sooner that after 
a half is finished.

But this means that if I discover an opponent's revoke
in one of the deals when I see the hand records
from the half that I have just finished then 
it is already too late to penalize/rectify it even if 
this opponent admits to having revoked and is ready 
to suffer the consequences.

Was it intended? If so - am I supposed to ask my opponents
to show me their hands every single time I claim?
If they say "what for?" am I supposed to call the
TD?

It hardly seems practical. And it would annoy 
the hell out of everybody if I started doing it.

+=+ As under the 1997 Laws the situation is one in 
which Law 64C applies. At seminars Directors are 
often guided, should they notice a revoke in the play, 
not to draw attention to it until the right of rectification 
has expired.            ~ G ~     +=+