[blml] Correction of a revoke

[Sven Pran]

> On Behalf Of Jerry Fusselman
> Sven:
> >
> > And if he pays sufficient attention to the game he doesn't need the hand
> > records to discover that West had revoked. You are correct in that L64C
> > cannot be used in this case, quite sensible IMHO.
> >
> 
> He might not know about the revoke unless he asks to see the
> opponents' hands when he claims.  Your logic seems to imply that
> paying sufficient attention to the game requires seeing the opponent's
> hands every time one claims.

How do you discover revoke when playing rubber and somebody claims?

The revoke laws are clearly written for players who are alert enough to
wonder "what happened to the last spade" and secure their interests.

Sven