[blml] concession

[gesta at tiscali.co.uk]

Grattan Endicott<gesta at tiscali.co.uk
[following address discontinued:
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk]
***********************
"In nature there are neither
rewards nor punishments -
there are consequences.
              [R.G.Ingersoll]
 +++++++++++++++++++++++
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sven Pran" <svenpran at online.no>
To: "'Bridge Laws Mailing List'" <blml at amsterdamned.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [blml] concession




> I fully agree with you Ton, but some people have noticed 
> that the words "or claim" were present in the drafts and 
> were removed in the final version of L68B. They use this 
> removal to argue that only concessions, not claims can
> be void under law 68B2.
>
+=+ The fact that someone outside of the DSC happens to 
be privy to a modification of the text does not give him/her 
any entitlement to make assertions as to the reasons for the 
modification.
       Such presumptions are speculative and unsound as a 
basis for deducing the intentions of the drafting body.     
                                      ~ Grattan ~  +=+